Donatos Pizza

Our automated check found that these summaries may not match the FDD's exact wording. Read the FDD excerpt itself; it is the authoritative text. Core cost, fee, Item 19 and outlet figures are not affected.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: 15–20k EBITDAatabove — Count

  “18 out of the 42 units or 43%, achieved or exceeded the +7.9% EBITDA”

  Note: P.75 states 18 of 42 units achieved/exceeded the +7.9% EBITDA threshold in the $15,001–$20,000 tier, while the same note says 40 stores were included. Tier sample size is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 76 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: >25k EBITDAatabove — Percent

  “9 out of the 15 units or 53%, achieved or exceeded the 16.4% EBITDA”

  Note: P.76 says 9 out of 15 stores (53%) in the above-$25,000 tier achieved/exceeded the 16.4% EBITDA threshold, while the tier is described as 17 stores.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Median EBITDA

  “The median EBITDA was 8.2%”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 COGS belowaverage — Stated denominator

  “20 of the 42 units, or 48%, incurred less than the average Cost of Goods Sold percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 COGS belowaverage — Percent

  “20 of the 42 units, or 48%, incurred less than the average Cost of Goods Sold percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Average Labor Costs NetSales share — weekly$15,001–$20,000

  “Labor Costs 30.7% 26.3% 24.4% 26.7%”

  Note: P.75 reports 26.3% Labor Costs for the $15,001–$20,000 tier, but says 40 restaurants included while the same note uses 42-unit denominators. Total population also conflicts (100 vs 101, pp.72,74); sample context is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Labor belowaverage — Stated denominator

  “23 of the 42 units, or 55%, incurred less than the average Labor Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 76 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $20,001–$25,000 Controllable belowaverage — Percent

  “10 of the 15 units, or 50%, incurred less than the average Controllable Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.76 pairs 10 of 15 units with 50% for the $20,001–$25,000 tier. The count and share are internally inconsistent; the FDD does not settle which figure is correct.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Median Controllable Costs

  “The median percentage of Net Sales for Controllable Costs was 33.4%”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Labor belowaverage — Percent

  “23 of the 42 units, or 55%, incurred less than the average Labor Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 76 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $20,001–$25,000 COGS belowaverage — Percent

  “6 of the 15 units, or 41%, incurred less than the average the Cost of Goods Sold percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.76 pairs 6 of 15 units with 41% for the $20,001–$25,000 tier. The count and share are internally inconsistent; the FDD does not settle which figure is correct.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 74 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Franchise-owned 2024 — Sample

  “45 of 116 units, or 39%, reported Net Sales for 2024 that exceeded the group’s average Net Sales for 2023 listed above.”

  Note: P.74 states the 2024 franchisee-owned comparison sample is 116 units, but says they exceeded a 2023 average not disclosed in the surrounding table. The applicable comparison context cannot be verified.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 74 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Company-owned 2024 — Sample

  “25 of 51 units, or 49%, reported Net Sales for 2024 that exceeded the group’s average Net Sales for 2023 listed above.”

  Note: P.74 states the 2024 company-owned comparison sample is 51 units, but says they exceeded a 2023 average not disclosed in the surrounding table. The applicable comparison context cannot be verified.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 74 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Franchise-owned 2024 — Count above referencedaverage

  “45 of 116 units, or 39%, reported Net Sales for 2024 that exceeded the group’s average Net Sales for 2023 listed above.”

  Note: P.74 states 45 of 116 franchisee-owned units (39%) exceeded the 2023 average for 2024, but no 2023 average is disclosed in the surrounding table. The comparison context cannot be verified.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Median Labor Costs

  “The median percentage of Net Sales for Labor Costs was 26.1%”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 74 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Company-owned 2024 — Count above referencedaverage

  “25 of 51 units, or 49%, reported Net Sales for 2024 that exceeded the group’s average Net Sales for 2023 listed above.”

  Note: P.74 states 25 of 51 company-owned units (49%) exceeded the 2023 average for 2024, but no 2023 average is disclosed in the surrounding table. The comparison context cannot be verified.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Average EBITDA NetSales share — weekly$15,001–$20,000

  “EBITDA -2.8% 7.7% 12.4% 13.9%”

  Note: P.75 reports EBITDA 7.7% for the $15,001–$20,000 tier, but says 40 restaurants included while the same note uses 42-unit denominators. Total population also conflicts (100 vs 101, pp.72,74); sample context is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 74 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Company-owned 2024 — Percent above referencedaverage

  “25 of 51 units, or 49%, reported Net Sales for 2024 that exceeded the group’s average Net Sales for 2023 listed above.”

  Note: P.74 states 49% of 51 company-owned units exceeded the 2023 average for 2024, but no 2023 average is disclosed in the surrounding table. The comparison context cannot be verified.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 74 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Franchise-owned 2024 — Percent above referencedaverage

  “45 of 116 units, or 39%, reported Net Sales for 2024 that exceeded the group’s average Net Sales for 2023 listed above.”

  Note: P.74 states 39% of 116 franchisee-owned units exceeded the 2023 average for 2024, but no 2023 average is disclosed in the surrounding table. The comparison context cannot be verified.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Average Controllable Costs NetSales share — weekly$15,001–$20,000

  “Controllable Costs 39.8% 34.1% 31.4% 27.4%”

  Note: P.75 reports 34.1% Controllable Costs for the $15,001–$20,000 tier, but says 40 restaurants included while the same note uses 42-unit denominators. Total population also conflicts (100 vs 101, pp.72,74); sample context is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 COGS belowaverage — Count

  “20 of the 42 units, or 48%, incurred less than the average Cost of Goods Sold percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 footnote says 40 stores were in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but gives this comparison as 20 of 42. The tier sample size is inconsistent, and overall Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Labor belowaverage — Count

  “23 of the 42 units, or 55%, incurred less than the average Labor Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Median Cost of Goods Sold

  “The median percentage of Net Sales for Cost of Goods Sold was 32.1%”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Controllable belowaverage — Count

  “24 of the 42 units, or 55%, incurred less than the average Controllable Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Controllable belowaverage — Stated denominator

  “24 of the 42 units, or 55%, incurred less than the average Controllable Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Average Cost of Goods Sold NetSales share — weekly$15,001–$20,000

  “Cost of Goods Sold 32.3% 31.9% 31.7% 32.1%”

  Note: P.75 reports 31.9% COGS for the $15,001–$20,000 weekly-sales tier, but says 40 restaurants included while the same note uses 42-unit denominators. Total population also conflicts (100 vs 101, pp.72,74); sample context is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 Controllable belowaverage — Percent

  “24 of the 42 units, or 55%, incurred less than the average Controllable Costs percentage of Net Sales”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: 15–20k EBITDAatabove — Stated denominator

  “18 out of the 42 units or 43%, achieved or exceeded the +7.9% EBITDA”

  Note: P.75 says 40 restaurants were included in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but gives 42 as the EBITDA comparison denominator. Sample/population context is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 76 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: >25k EBITDAatabove — Count

  “9 out of the 15 units or 53%, achieved or exceeded the 16.4% EBITDA”

  Note: P.76 says the above-$25,000 tier contains 17 stores, but its EBITDA comparison uses 9 out of 15 and 53%. The applicable denominator is inconsistent.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 76 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: >25k EBITDAatabove — Stated denominator

  “9 out of the 15 units or 53%, achieved or exceeded the 16.4% EBITDA”

  Note: P.76 describes 17 stores in the above-$25,000 tier but uses 15 as the denominator for the EBITDA comparison. The claim’s sample context is unsettled.

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: $15,001–$20,000 EBITDAcomparison threshold

  “achieved or exceeded the +7.9% EBITDA”

  Note: P.75 describes 40 included stores in the $15,001–$20,000 tier but uses 42-unit denominators in its notes. The tier sample and thus this metric’s applicable population are unsettled; Section II totals also conflict (100 vs 101).

• Item 19 · PDF p. 75 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: 15–20k EBITDAatabove — Percent

  “18 out of the 42 units or 43%, achieved or exceeded the +7.9% EBITDA”

  Note: P.75 gives 18 of 42 units (43%) for the $15,001–$20,000 tier, but says 40 restaurants were included. Applicable sample context is unsettled.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2024 — Start

  “2024 127 125 - 2”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2024 — End

  “2024 127 125 - 2”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2024 — Netchange

  “2024 127 125 - 2”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2025 — End

  “2025 125 128 +3”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2025 — Netchange

  “2025 125 128 +3”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2023 — End

  “2023 52 51 - 1”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2025 — Start

  “2025 51 51 0”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2024 — Netchange

  “2024 51 51 0”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2023 — Netchange

  “2023 52 51 - 1”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2024 — Start

  “2024 51 51 0”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2023 — Start

  “2023 52 51 - 1”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2025 — Netchange

  “2025 51 51 0”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2025 — End

  “2025 51 51 0”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2023 — Netchange

  “2023 121 127 +6”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Franchised 2025 — Start

  “2025 125 128 +3”

  Note: This is not a verifiable national/systemwide Total row for Item 20.

• Item 20 · PDF p. 79 · 2026 FDD

  Our summary: Table1 Company-Owned 2024 — End

  “2024 51 51 0”

  Note: Item 20 claim is state/geography-specific or not a national/systemwide Total row; it cannot be verified under the required scope.