Franchise opportunities compared

    EOS Worldwide vs MN Filing 35480-202603-02

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
    • EOS Worldwide discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
    • Only EOS Worldwide has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
    DisclosureEOS WorldwideMFMN Filing 35480-202603-02
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    $61,715 – $152,540
    2026 FDD · Item 7
    $37,350 – $139,000
    Total estimated initial investment: $37,350–$139,000
    2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 22
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    $5,000
    2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 15
    $45,000
    2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 12
    Royalty (Item 6)
    Not available
    No reviewed royalty record
    $900
    Months 1–4, one Associate monthly royalty
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 20
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    $100
    Brand fund initial monthly maximum
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 19
    $3,600
    Initial marketing fee
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    738
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 70
    229
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 51
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    +76
    Calculated: 662 at end of 2023 → 738 at end of 2025
    +60
    Calculated: 169 at end of 2023 → 229 at end of 2025
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Professional U.S. operational franchisees
    $4,000 /year
    other Professional · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 66
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Certified U.S. operational franchisees
    $351,464 /year
    other Certified · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 66
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Expert U.S. operational franchisees
    $696,070 /year
    other Expert · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 66
    +2 more groups in the full report
    No reviewed Item 19 figures

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.

    EOS Worldwide vs MN Filing 35480-202603-02: common questions

    Which costs less to open, EOS Worldwide or MN Filing 35480-202603-02?
    EOS Worldwide: $61,715 – $152,540 (2026 FDD · Item 7); MN Filing 35480-202603-02: $37,350 – $139,000 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 22). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for MN Filing 35480-202603-02. At least one range spans several business formats. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
    Which has more locations, EOS Worldwide or MN Filing 35480-202603-02?
    EOS Worldwide: 738 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 70); MN Filing 35480-202603-02: 229 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 51). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
    Do EOS Worldwide and MN Filing 35480-202603-02 disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
    EOS Worldwide has reviewed Item 19 figures for 5 location groups; MN Filing 35480-202603-02 has no reviewed Item 19 figures on file. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.

    Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.

    How Franopolis reviews FDD figures