Franchise opportunities compared
Isembard vs TeamLogic IT
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
- Isembard and TeamLogic IT disclose more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
- Only TeamLogic IT has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
| Disclosure | IIsembard | TITeamLogic IT |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | $32,000 – $401,050 2026 FDD · Item 7 | $115,742 – $150,806 2026 FDD · Item 7 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | $30,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 9 | $49,500 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 11 |
| Royalty (Item 6) | $12 Early termination liquidated damages based on average royalty fees over past 12 months multiplied by lesser of 24 or full calendar months remaining 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13 | $1,000 Minimum monthly continuing franchise fee beginning month thirteen 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | Not available No reviewed brand or advertising fund fee | $200 Advertising fund fee — monthly minimum 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | 1 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 48 | 344 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 35 |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | +1 Calculated: 0 at end of 2023 → 1 at end of 2025 | +62 Calculated: 282 at end of 2023 → 344 at end of 2025 |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | 2005 From a verified franchisor listing |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | No reviewed Item 19 figures | Franchised (46 locations) — other measures — Quartile1of182qualifiedfranchisees 46 franchisees other Quartile1 Qualified franchisees · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 33 Franchised (45 locations) — other measures — Quartile3of182qualifiedfranchisees $265,447 other Quartile3 Lowest · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 33 Franchised (46 locations) — other measures — Quartile2of182qualifiedfranchisees $1,615,113 other Quartile2 Highest · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 33 +15 more groups in the full report |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
Isembard vs TeamLogic IT: common questions
- Which costs less to open, Isembard or TeamLogic IT?
- Isembard: $32,000 – $401,050 (2026 FDD · Item 7); TeamLogic IT: $115,742 – $150,806 (2026 FDD · Item 7). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for Isembard. At least one range spans several business formats. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
- How do Isembard and TeamLogic IT royalties compare?
- Isembard: $12 (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13); TeamLogic IT: $1,000 (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Which has more locations, Isembard or TeamLogic IT?
- Isembard: 1 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 48); TeamLogic IT: 344 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 35). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
- Do Isembard and TeamLogic IT disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- Isembard has no reviewed Item 19 figures on file; TeamLogic IT has reviewed Item 19 figures for 18 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.