Franchise opportunities compared
Mb Holdings vs MN Filing 35480-202603-02
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
- Only Mb Holdings has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
| Disclosure |  Mb Holdings | MFMN Filing 35480-202603-02 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | $154,575 – $189,600 Total Initial Investment 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 14 | $37,350 – $139,000 Total estimated initial investment: $37,350–$139,000 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 22 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | $49,900 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 8 | $45,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 12 |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 3.5% · Percentage of Gross Sales, depending on annual Gross Sales bracket; greater of percentage-based royalty or minimum royalty Royalty Fee 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 10 | $900 Months 1–4, one Associate monthly royalty 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 20 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | 2% of percentage of gross sales Brand Fund Fee 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 10 | $3,600 Initial marketing fee 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | 71 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 36 | 229 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 51 |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | −2 Calculated: 73 at end of 2023 → 71 at end of 2025 | +60 Calculated: 169 at end of 2023 → 229 at end of 2025 |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | 2024 2026 FDD · Item 1 · PDF p. 8 | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | 2020 2026 FDD · Item 1 · PDF p. 8 | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | Franchised (16 locations) — revenue $433,527 mean Gross Sales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 35 Franchised (67 locations) — revenue — All Qualifying Franchisees $637,111 median Gross Sales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 35 Franchised (13 locations) — revenue $463,961 mean Gross Sales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 35 +2 more groups in the full report | No reviewed Item 19 figures |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
Mb Holdings vs MN Filing 35480-202603-02: common questions
- Which costs less to open, Mb Holdings or MN Filing 35480-202603-02?
- Mb Holdings: $154,575 – $189,600 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 14); MN Filing 35480-202603-02: $37,350 – $139,000 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 22). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for MN Filing 35480-202603-02. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
- How do Mb Holdings and MN Filing 35480-202603-02 royalties compare?
- Mb Holdings: 3.5% · Percentage of Gross Sales, depending on annual Gross Sales bracket; greater of percentage-based royalty or minimum royalty (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 10); MN Filing 35480-202603-02: $900 (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 20). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Which has more locations, Mb Holdings or MN Filing 35480-202603-02?
- Mb Holdings: 71 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 36); MN Filing 35480-202603-02: 229 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 51). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
- Do Mb Holdings and MN Filing 35480-202603-02 disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- Mb Holdings has reviewed Item 19 figures for 5 location groups; MN Filing 35480-202603-02 has no reviewed Item 19 figures on file. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.