Franchise opportunities compared

    MN Filing 35201-202512-06 vs Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • MN Filing 35201-202512-06 figures come from its 2025 FDD and Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC figures from its 2026 FDD, so the years differ.
    • Only Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
    DisclosureMFMN Filing 35201-202512-06Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    $1,396,000 – $2,703,000
    Total Initial Investment range
    2025 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 20
    $1,168,500 – $9,290,400
    Cash As Incurred Approved Suppliers & Employees Grand Total 14 (low end)
    2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 24
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    $40,000
    2025 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 12
    $35,000
    2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 12
    Royalty (Item 6)
    5%
    Royalty Fees
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13
    6%
    Royalty Fee rate
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 14
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    2%
    Advertising Fund Contribution — 2%
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13
    2%
    Marketing Fund Fee maximum — 2%
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 14
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    Not available
    No reviewed outlet counts
    Not available
    No reviewed outlet counts
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    Not available
    Only one year reported
    Not available
    Only one year reported
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    Not disclosed — no Item 19 financial performance representation
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 21 franchised Spitz Restaurants reporting complete financial performance inform…
    $1,715,617
    other Table 1 average Gross Revenues · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 66
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Four affiliate-owned Spitz Restaurants for Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2025; all four were…
    $685,359
    other Table 2 average Other Costs · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 66

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.

    MN Filing 35201-202512-06 vs Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC: common questions

    Which costs less to open, MN Filing 35201-202512-06 or Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC?
    MN Filing 35201-202512-06: $1,396,000 – $2,703,000 (2025 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 20); Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC: $1,168,500 – $9,290,400 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 24). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
    How do MN Filing 35201-202512-06 and Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC royalties compare?
    MN Filing 35201-202512-06: 5% (2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13); Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC: 6% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 14). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
    Do MN Filing 35201-202512-06 and Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
    MN Filing 35201-202512-06 makes no Item 19 financial performance representation; Spitz Radwick Franchising LLC has reviewed Item 19 figures for 2 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.

    Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.

    How Franopolis reviews FDD figures