Franchise opportunities compared
Drybar vs MN Filing 35684-202603-12
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
- Item 19 figures cover the location groups each FDD names (Drybar: 8, MN Filing 35684-202603-12: 5). Different groups are not directly comparable.
| Disclosure |  Drybar | MFMN Filing 35684-202603-12 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | Not available No reviewed Item 7 total | $373,442 – $544,293 Single-unit Grand Total 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 23 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | $50,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 13 | $50,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 15 |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 7% Monthly royalty gross receipts 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 15 | 6% Royalty fee: 6% of Gross Revenue per month 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 16 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | 4% Brand fund maximum — 4% 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 18 | $1,500 Cooperative advertising minimum monthly contribution 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 17 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | 198 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 73 | 40 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 49 |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | +39 Calculated: 159 at end of 2023 → 198 at end of 2025 | +0 Calculated: 40 at end of 2023 → 40 at end of 2025 |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | 2011 From a verified franchisor listing | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Top 10 10 shops other Top 10 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 71 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Bottom third 47 shops other Bottom third · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 71 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — All shops 167 shops other All shops · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 71 +5 more groups in the full report | Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — BISHOPS locations in revenue Quartile 4, Measurement Period calendar year 2025. $359,632 other Total revenue · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 48 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — BISHOPS locations in revenue Quartile 1, Measurement Period calendar year 2025. $744,416 other total revenue · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 48 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — BISHOPS locations in revenue Quartile 1 (Q1), Measurement Period calendar year… $977,579 other Total revenue · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 48 +2 more groups in the full report |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
Drybar vs MN Filing 35684-202603-12: common questions
- How do Drybar and MN Filing 35684-202603-12 royalties compare?
- Drybar: 7% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 15); MN Filing 35684-202603-12: 6% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 16). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Which has more locations, Drybar or MN Filing 35684-202603-12?
- Drybar: 198 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 73); MN Filing 35684-202603-12: 40 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 49). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
- Do Drybar and MN Filing 35684-202603-12 disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- Drybar has reviewed Item 19 figures for 8 location groups; MN Filing 35684-202603-12 has reviewed Item 19 figures for 5 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.