Franchise opportunities compared

    Glo30 Franchise LLC vs Pure Glow

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • Both sets of figures come from 2025 FDDs.
    • Item 19 figures cover the location groups each FDD names (Glo30 Franchise LLC: 4, Pure Glow: 2). Different groups are not directly comparable.
    DisclosureGFGlo30 Franchise LLCPure Glow
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    $295,500
    TOTAL — $295500
    2025 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 20
    $563,925 – $966,650
    Total initial investment — single studio lower estimate
    2025 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 19
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    $45,000
    2025 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 11
    $50,000
    2025 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 9
    Royalty (Item 6)
    $6.00
    Royalty Fee — 6%
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13
    2) — 7%
    Royalties
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 10
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    $120
    Unreported weekly sales — provisional Worldwide Creative Marketing collection 120% of last fee
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 18
    $1.00
    Brand Development Fee — 1%
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 10
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    10
    Outlets at end of 2024
    2025 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 54
    Not available
    No reviewed outlet counts
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    +7
    Calculated: 3 at end of 2022 → 10 at end of 2024
    Not available
    Only one year reported
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Bethesda Maryland single affiliate location
    $1,546,476
    other Bethesda Maryland · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 49
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Washington DC Shaw single affiliate location
    $527,424
    other Washington DC Shaw · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 50
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Washington DC Wharf single affiliate location
    $723,410
    other Washington DC Wharf · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 51
    +1 more groups in the full report
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Wellesley
    $11,826
    other Wellesley · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 60
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Back Bay
    $38,732
    other Back Bay · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 61

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.