Franchise opportunities compared

    Liftology vs MN Filing 36062-202604-01

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
    • Only MN Filing 36062-202604-01 has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
    DisclosureLiftologyMFMN Filing 36062-202604-01
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    $187,800 – $427,750
    Total — $187800
    2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 15
    $681,372 – $1,151,135
    Franchise Agreement — Studio initial investment: TOTAL ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT $681,372–$1,151,135
    2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 30
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    Not available
    No single standard fee identified
    Not available
    No single standard fee identified
    Royalty (Item 6)
    7%
    Royalty — 7%
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 9
    7%
    Royalty
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 23
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    2%
    Marketing Fund Contribution — 2% — 2%
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 10
    2%
    Brand Development Fund contribution — 2%
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 23
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    Not available
    No reviewed outlet counts
    88
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 77
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    Not available
    Only one year reported
    +24
    Calculated: 64 at end of 2023 → 88 at end of 2025
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    Not disclosed — no Item 19 financial performance representation
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Qualified Studios in the 2nd Quartile
    202 members
    other Part A-2 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 71
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Qualified Studios in the 3rd Quartile
    4 studios
    other Part A-2 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 71
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Qualified Studios in the 4th Quartile
    104 members
    other Part A-2 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 71
    +15 more groups in the full report

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.

    Liftology vs MN Filing 36062-202604-01: common questions

    Which costs less to open, Liftology or MN Filing 36062-202604-01?
    Liftology: $187,800 – $427,750 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 15); MN Filing 36062-202604-01: $681,372 – $1,151,135 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 30). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for Liftology. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
    How do Liftology and MN Filing 36062-202604-01 royalties compare?
    Liftology: 7% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 9); MN Filing 36062-202604-01: 7% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 23). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
    Do Liftology and MN Filing 36062-202604-01 disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
    Liftology makes no Item 19 financial performance representation; MN Filing 36062-202604-01 has reviewed Item 19 figures for 18 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.

    Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.

    How Franopolis reviews FDD figures