Franchise opportunities compared
MedXwaste vs MN Filing 35519-202603-08
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
- Only MN Filing 35519-202603-08 has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
| Disclosure |  MedXwaste | MFMN Filing 35519-202603-08 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | $101,535 – $141,985 TOTAL 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 17 | $182,350 – $226,200 Total initial investment range 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 1 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | $50,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 11 | $74,500 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 8 |
| Royalty (Item 6) | Greater of $650 or 8% of gross sales after 90 business days Royalty Fee 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12 | 10% Royalty Fee, Year 1: 10% of Gross Sales 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 9 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | Not available No reviewed brand or advertising fund fee | 0.5% Marketing Fund: currently 0.5% of Gross Sales — 0.5% 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 9 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | 11 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 41 | 26 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 33 |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | +5 Calculated: 6 at end of 2023 → 11 at end of 2025 | +0 Calculated: 26 at end of 2023 → 26 at end of 2025 |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | 2019 2026 FDD · Item 1 · PDF p. 9 | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | 2019 2026 FDD · Item 1 · PDF p. 9 | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | Not disclosed — no Item 19 financial performance representation | Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Franchised RENUE businesses opened 2001–2003 $15 other Businesses opened 2001-2003 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 30 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Franchised RENUE businesses opened 2004-2007 $14 other Businesses opened 2004-2007 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 30 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Franchised RENUE businesses opened 2008-2014 $14 other Businesses opened 2008-2014 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 30 +18 more groups in the full report |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
MedXwaste vs MN Filing 35519-202603-08: common questions
- Which costs less to open, MedXwaste or MN Filing 35519-202603-08?
- MedXwaste: $101,535 – $141,985 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 17); MN Filing 35519-202603-08: $182,350 – $226,200 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 1). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for MedXwaste. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
- How do MedXwaste and MN Filing 35519-202603-08 royalties compare?
- MedXwaste: Greater of $650 or 8% of gross sales after 90 business days (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12); MN Filing 35519-202603-08: 10% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 9). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Which has more locations, MedXwaste or MN Filing 35519-202603-08?
- MedXwaste: 11 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 41); MN Filing 35519-202603-08: 26 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 33). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
- Do MedXwaste and MN Filing 35519-202603-08 disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- MedXwaste makes no Item 19 financial performance representation; MN Filing 35519-202603-08 has reviewed Item 19 figures for 21 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.