Franchise opportunities compared
MN Filing 35646-202603-13 vs Mr Brews Taphouse
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
- MN Filing 35646-202603-13 discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
- Only Mr Brews Taphouse has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
| Disclosure | MFMN Filing 35646-202603-13 | MBMr Brews Taphouse |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | $1,056,000 – $6,030,000 2026 FDD · Item 7 | $501,500 – $962,000 Total (14) — $501500 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 15 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | $40,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 35 | Not available No single standard fee identified |
| Royalty (Item 6) | $5.00 Royalty Fee and Surcharge: 5% of Gross Sales plus a maximum Surcharge of $10 per week 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 36 | $575 Royalty Fees — $575 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 11 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | 1% Advertising Fees: 1% of weekly Gross Sales — 1% 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 36 | 1% Marketing Fund Fees — 1% — 1% 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 11 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | 2 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 89 | 11 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 38 |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | −1 Calculated: 3 at end of 2023 → 2 at end of 2025 | −1 Calculated: 12 at end of 2023 → 11 at end of 2025 |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | No reviewed Item 19 figures | Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — One affiliate-owned Wisconsin restaurant $964,527 other Affiliate-owned net sales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 37 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Eight franchised restaurants operating full year $1,497,366 other High net sales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 37 |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
MN Filing 35646-202603-13 vs Mr Brews Taphouse: common questions
- Which costs less to open, MN Filing 35646-202603-13 or Mr Brews Taphouse?
- MN Filing 35646-202603-13: $1,056,000 – $6,030,000 (2026 FDD · Item 7); Mr Brews Taphouse: $501,500 – $962,000 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 15). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for Mr Brews Taphouse. At least one range spans several business formats. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
- How do MN Filing 35646-202603-13 and Mr Brews Taphouse royalties compare?
- MN Filing 35646-202603-13: $5.00 (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 36); Mr Brews Taphouse: $575 (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 11). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Which has more locations, MN Filing 35646-202603-13 or Mr Brews Taphouse?
- MN Filing 35646-202603-13: 2 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 89); Mr Brews Taphouse: 11 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 38). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
- Do MN Filing 35646-202603-13 and Mr Brews Taphouse disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- MN Filing 35646-202603-13 has no reviewed Item 19 figures on file; Mr Brews Taphouse has reviewed Item 19 figures for 2 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.