Franchise opportunities compared

    MN Filing 35712-202603-09 vs NaturaLawn of America

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
    • MN Filing 35712-202603-09 discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
    • Only NaturaLawn of America has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
    DisclosureMFMN Filing 35712-202603-09NaturaLawn of America
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    $21,550 – $68,250
    2026 FDD · Item 7
    $77,500 – $250,000
    Total
    2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 14
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    $15,900
    2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 12
    Not available
    No single standard fee identified
    Royalty (Item 6)
    5%
    Royalty percent
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 13
    Not available
    No reviewed royalty record
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    Not available
    No reviewed brand or advertising fund fee
    1% of percentage of gross sales
    Advertising Fee
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    245
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 52
    93
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 38
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    +5
    Calculated: 240 at end of 2023 → 245 at end of 2025
    −7
    Calculated: 100 at end of 2023 → 93 at end of 2025
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    1989
    2026 FDD · Item 1 · PDF p. 7
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    1987
    2026 FDD · Item 1 · PDF p. 7
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    No reviewed Item 19 figures
    Franchised (38 locations) — revenue
    $30,927,089
    mean Annual Gross Revenue · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 37
    Company-owned (6 locations) — revenue
    $1,748,331
    mean Annual Gross Sales Revenue · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 36
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record
    59.3 – 2,025 percent
    range Gross Profit Margin · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 36

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.

    MN Filing 35712-202603-09 vs NaturaLawn of America: common questions

    Which costs less to open, MN Filing 35712-202603-09 or NaturaLawn of America?
    MN Filing 35712-202603-09: $21,550 – $68,250 (2026 FDD · Item 7); NaturaLawn of America: $77,500 – $250,000 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 14). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for MN Filing 35712-202603-09. At least one range spans several business formats. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
    Which has more locations, MN Filing 35712-202603-09 or NaturaLawn of America?
    MN Filing 35712-202603-09: 245 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 52); NaturaLawn of America: 93 (2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 38). Total outlets from Item 20. Outlet counts do not indicate territory availability or franchisee results.
    Do MN Filing 35712-202603-09 and NaturaLawn of America disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
    MN Filing 35712-202603-09 has no reviewed Item 19 figures on file; NaturaLawn of America has reviewed Item 19 figures for 3 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.

    Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.

    How Franopolis reviews FDD figures