Franchise opportunities compared
PIRTEK vs Temporary Wall Systems
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
- Temporary Wall Systems discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
- Only PIRTEK has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
| Disclosure |  PIRTEK |  Temporary Wall Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | $247,013 – $689,614 Tier 1/Tier 2 — TOTAL (Note 21) 2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 27 | $155,444 – $936,444 2026 FDD · Item 7 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | Not available No single standard fee identified | Not available No single standard fee identified |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 4% Continuing License Fee — 4% 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 16 | 8% open and operating. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you must still pay the Royalty Fee equal to — 8 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 28 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | 1.5% Marketing Fees — 1.5% — 1.5% 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 17 | 3% of 2) currently, — 3 Program or any other training program. ITEM 6 OTHER FEES Brand Fund Contribution 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 17 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | 194 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 67 | Not available No reviewed outlet counts |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | +53 Calculated: 141 at end of 2023 → 194 at end of 2025 | Not available Only one year reported |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | 1997 From a verified franchisor listing | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — All Franchised Centers continuously operating full year 152 units other All Franchised Centers 2025 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 61 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Tier 1 Centers continuously operating full year 115 units other Tier 1 Centers 2025 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 61 Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Tier 2 Centers continuously operating full year $574,193 other Tier 2 Centers 2025 · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 61 +15 more groups in the full report | Not disclosed — no Item 19 financial performance representation |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
PIRTEK vs Temporary Wall Systems: common questions
- Which costs less to open, PIRTEK or Temporary Wall Systems?
- PIRTEK: $247,013 – $689,614 (2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 27); Temporary Wall Systems: $155,444 – $936,444 (2026 FDD · Item 7). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for Temporary Wall Systems. At least one range spans several business formats. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
- How do PIRTEK and Temporary Wall Systems royalties compare?
- PIRTEK: 4% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 16); Temporary Wall Systems: 8% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 28). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Do PIRTEK and Temporary Wall Systems disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- PIRTEK has reviewed Item 19 figures for 18 location groups; Temporary Wall Systems makes no Item 19 financial performance representation. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.