Franchise opportunities compared
Sugar Llamas Enterprises vs sweetFrog
Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.
Before you compare
- Sugar Llamas Enterprises figures come from its 2024 FDD and sweetFrog figures from its 2026 FDD, so the years differ.
- sweetFrog discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
- Only sweetFrog has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
| Disclosure |  Sugar Llamas Enterprises |  sweetFrog |
|---|---|---|
| Financial commitment | ||
| Estimated initial investment (Item 7) | $252,400 – $368,200 Total estimated initial investment 2024 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 17 | $25,000 – $692,000 2026 FDD · Item 7 |
| Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5) | $30,000 2024 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 10 | $10,000 2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 29 |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 5% Royalty fee rate 2024 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 11 | 5% · Notes 1 and 13) — 5% umn 3 Due Date Column 4 Remarks Royalty Fee and Surcharge 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 32 |
| Brand / advertising fund (Item 6) | 0.5% Brand development fee — 0.5% 2024 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 11 | 2.5% of traditional franchised business) (note 1) — 2.5% Advertising Fee 2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 32 |
| System scale & health | ||
| Total outlets (Item 20) | Not available No reviewed outlet counts | 406 Outlets at end of 2025 2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 83 |
| Net outlet change (Item 20) | Not available Only one year reported | −26 Calculated: 432 at end of 2023 → 406 at end of 2025 |
| Outlet exits (Item 20) | Not available No complete exit records for a year | Not available No complete exit records for a year |
| Franchising since (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Franchisor founded (Item 1) | Not available Not in reviewed records | Not available Not in reviewed records |
| Performance (Item 19) | ||
| Financial performance (Item 19), by location group | Not disclosed — no Item 19 financial performance representation | Franchised (185 locations) — other measures — All franchised sweetFrog stores in the United States that were eligible for the… $514,782 other All franchised outlets · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 82 Franchised (37 locations) — other measures — Top 20% franchised sweetFrog outlets within the eligible US gross-sales populat… 37 units other Top 20% franchised outlets · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 82 Franchised (37 locations) — other measures — Bottom 20% franchised sweetFrog outlets in the eligible US group for Dec. 1, 20… 25 units other Bottom 20% franchised outlets · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 82 +1 more groups in the full report |
Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.
Sugar Llamas Enterprises vs sweetFrog: common questions
- Which costs less to open, Sugar Llamas Enterprises or sweetFrog?
- Sugar Llamas Enterprises: $252,400 – $368,200 (2024 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 17); sweetFrog: $25,000 – $692,000 (2026 FDD · Item 7). These are each franchisor's Item 7 estimated initial investment. The low end of the disclosed estimate is lower for sweetFrog. At least one range spans several business formats. Estimates are not quotes, and the FDD years may differ.
- How do Sugar Llamas Enterprises and sweetFrog royalties compare?
- Sugar Llamas Enterprises: 5% (2024 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 11); sweetFrog: 5% · Notes 1 and 13) — 5% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 32). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
- Do Sugar Llamas Enterprises and sweetFrog disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- Sugar Llamas Enterprises makes no Item 19 financial performance representation; sweetFrog has reviewed Item 19 figures for 4 location groups. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.
Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.