Franchise opportunities compared

    Camp Bow Wow vs Scoop Soldiers

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • Both sets of figures come from 2026 FDDs.
    • Camp Bow Wow discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
    • Item 19 figures cover the location groups each FDD names (Camp Bow Wow: 6, Scoop Soldiers: 131). Different groups are not directly comparable.
    DisclosureCamp Bow WowScoop Soldiers
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    $70,846 – $1,229,536
    2026 FDD · Item 7
    $64,100
    Single territory total range low
    2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 19
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    Not available
    No single standard fee identified
    $39,500
    2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 12
    Royalty (Item 6)
    7%
    Royalty on loss of good standing — percentage of Net Revenue, subject to greater minimum monthly royalty
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 26
    $16
    Royalty weekly gross sales
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 14
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    $3.00
    Advertisingfundcap
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 19
    $3.00
    Brand development maximum reiterated
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 17
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    225
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 82
    115
    Outlets at end of 2025
    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 62
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    +9
    Calculated: 216 at end of 2023 → 225 at end of 2025
    +38
    Calculated: 77 at end of 2023 → 115 at end of 2025
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    2003
    From a verified franchisor listing
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group1 all
    207 camps
    other Group1 all sample · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 74
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group1 top25%profit
    $2,465,224
    other Group1 top25%profit highgrosssales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 74
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group1 bottom25%profit
    $1,293,176
    other Group1 bottom25%profit highgrosssales · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 75
    +3 more groups in the full report
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Washington, D.C.
    $150,111
    other Table2 Washington, D.C. · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 46
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Salt Lake City, UT
    6,126 stops
    other Table2 Salt Lake City, UT · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 46
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Seattle, WA
    $206,410
    other Table2 Seattle, WA · 2026 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 46
    +128 more groups in the full report

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.