Lawn Care
Franchise research report · reviewed 2026 disclosure data
Researching Lawn Care franchise opportunities? Every figure below is cited to the FDD.
Canopy franchises provide subscription-based lawn care services using a technology-enabled operating model. Services include lawn applications such as turf fertilization and weed control and prevention for residential properties.
Headline figures
Lawn Care quick facts
- Is Lawn Care a franchise?
- Yes. Lawn Care offers franchises through a Franchise Disclosure Document. At the end of 2025, it reported 41 franchised and 5 company-owned outlets (2026 FDD, Item 20, PDF p. 54).
- How much does it cost to open a Lawn Care franchise?
- The Lawn Care Franchise Disclosure Document reports separate estimated initial investments by format: $97,900–$185,200 for total estimated initial investment: $97,900 / $185,200 (2025 FDD, Item 7, PDF p. 22); $98,100–$188,200 for total (2026 FDD, Item 7, PDF p. 25). These formats are not combined. Each is the franchisor's disclosed estimate, not a quote. Details
- What is the Lawn Care initial franchise fee?
- The disclosed initial franchise fee for a standard single unit is $49,500 (2026 FDD, Item 5, PDF p. 18). Other fee options (for example multi-unit or conversion) are listed separately in the report. Details
- What ongoing fees does Lawn Care charge?
- The disclosed ongoing royalty is 8% (2025 FDD, Item 6, PDF p. 17). The brand or advertising fund contribution is 1% (2025 FDD, Item 6, PDF p. 17). Other recurring fees are listed in Item 6. Details
- Does Lawn Care disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- Yes. The Lawn Care FDD includes an Item 19 financial performance representation (2025 FDD, Item 19, PDF p. 49). Figures apply only to the locations and period each one covers. Details
- How many Lawn Care locations are there?
- The FDD reports 46 outlets at the end of 2025 (2026 FDD, Item 20, PDF p. 54). Existing locations do not indicate territory availability. Details
- Is Lawn Care a good franchise to buy?
- Franopolis does not rate or recommend franchises. From the reviewed FDD: Item 19 includes financial performance figures; check which locations and period they cover; Item 20 lists outlet openings, closures and transfers; Item 6 includes a brand or advertising fund contribution on top of royalty; Item 20 also lists current and former franchisees you can contact. Review the full FDD with a franchise attorney and accountant before deciding.
From reviewed FDD figures only. Not a recommendation or projection.
What the disclosures show
- 1Opening costs are estimated at $98,100 – $188,200 in the 2026 FDD (Item 7); several initial fee options apply.
- 2Item 19 covers 4 separate groups: other measures for 1,314 locations; other measures for 1,070 locations; other measures for 244 locations; other measures for locations. They are not combined.
- 3Outlets grew by 4 in 2025, to 46 (Systemwide, as labeled in the FDD, Item 20).
From reviewed FDD figures only. Not a recommendation or projection.
Lawn Care head-to-head
Closest peers in the same subcategory, side by side from reviewed FDD figures. Not a ranking or recommendation.
Costs · Items 5–7
What does it cost to open?
Estimated opening costs and the fees payable to the franchisor.
Startup Investment — Item 7
Total estimated initial investment
2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 25
Standard single-unit franchise fee
2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 18
Discounted and multi-unit options are separate; see all fees.
Ongoing Fees — Item 6
Selected recurring charges; payment bases and conditions remain attached to each fee.
- Royalty percentageMain ongoing fee
53 reported fees, each with its payment basis, are listed below; they haven't been sorted into recurring, initial and occasional groups yet.
Financial Performance — Item 19
What results are disclosed—and for which locations?
4 separate populations, shown apart. Revenue is not owner income.
1,314 locations
Other measures · 1,314 locations
- Who is counted
- The affiliate-owned and operated Corporate Unit in Raleigh, NC; revenue reported in aggregate for its territories
- Period
- number of accounts
- Excluded
- Excludes results, revenues and costs from the remote Charlotte territory; excludes other services outside the core/enhancement services described on p.49.
- Method
- Number of accounts serviced in Reporting Period January 1, 2025–December 31, 2025
These groups are never combined.
Outlet Changes — Item 20
How has the outlet count changed?
Systemwide, as labeled in the FDD · counts as of Fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 of each year.
2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 54
Net +38 outlets, 2022–2025
Year-end counts reported in Item 20. The scale starts at zero; the labels between the dots show each year's change. Openings and closures for 2025 haven't been pulled from the Item 20 tables yet, so no turnover or churn is shown.
Questions to investigate
Prompts based on what this brand's reviewed disclosures do and don't show — not conclusions. Join free as a member to save questions to your research.
For the franchisor
Which line items in the 2026 Item 7 estimate ($98,100 – $188,200) vary most by market, and why?
Which initial fee option would apply to my situation, and what conditions or discounts affect it?
Which locations are included in the Item 19 figures, and which were excluded?
Reported units went from 42 to 46 in 2025. How many new units opened, closed or changed hands?
Is a territory available in my area, and how is it defined in my agreement?
For current and former owners
How did your actual startup costs and timeline compare with the Item 7 estimate?
How many hours a week do you work in the business, and in what role?
How do your results compare with the Item 19 figures, and what explains the difference?
What support from the franchisor has been most and least useful?
For your advisors
Ask a franchise attorney to review the territory, renewal, transfer and termination terms.
Ask an accountant to build a cash-flow plan using your own assumptions, not the franchisor's.
Sources & vintage history
Every displayed fact is retained with its disclosure vintage, item, page, and reviewed status. Prior vintages remain on file rather than being overwritten.
Citations (2026 FDD)
- [1]Estimated initial investment — Item 7 · PDF p. 25
- [2]Standard initial franchise fee — Item 5 · PDF p. 18
- [3]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — The affiliate-owned and operated Corporate Unit in Raleigh, NC; revenue reporte… · PDF p. 49
- [4]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — The affiliate-owned and operated Corporate Unit in Raleigh, NC; revenue reporte… · PDF p. 49
- [5]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — The affiliate-owned and operated Corporate Unit in Raleigh, NC; revenue reporte… · PDF p. 49
- [6]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — The affiliate-owned and operated Corporate Unit in Raleigh, NC; revenue reporte… · PDF p. 49
- [7]Outlet counts — Item 20, Table 1 · PDF p. 54
"PDF p." is the page in the PDF file; "printed p." is the number printed on the FDD page.
Territory & operations
These are contract disclosures, not confirmation that any territory is currently available.
Legal & agreement
Franchisor financial statements
| Fiscal year | Measure | Reported value |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | member's equity 2024 | $244,456,766 |
| 2024 | 2024 net cash provided by operating activities: $28,738,817 | $28,738,817 |
| 2024 | 2024 total assets: $266,646,146 | $266,646,146 |
| 2024 | 2024 total revenue: $102,246,523 | $102,246,523 |
| 2024 | 2024 net income attributable to olb holdco: $20,635,648 | $20,635,648 |
| 2024 | total current assets 2024 | $19,459,852 |
| 2024 | net income attributable to outdoor living brands holdco, llc 2024 | $20,635,648 |
| 2024 | cash, end of year 2024 | $2,941,232 |
| 2024 | cash 2024 | $2,941,232 |
| 2024 | total assets 2024 | $266,646,146 |
| 2024 | total current liabilities 2024 | $10,808,631 |
| 2024 | net cash required by financing activities 2024 | -$26,088,010 |
These figures describe the franchisor company, not individual franchise locations.
What changed from 2025 to 2026
- Estimated initial investment: $97,900 – $185,200 → $98,100 – $188,200
- Franchise fee: $49,500 → $38,000
- System size: 126 → 46 units
SBA-backed loans to franchisees
Loading…
Source: U.S. Small Business Administration 7(a) & 504 FOIA data. Loan volume is not a measure of franchisee success.
Related research
Brands in the same subcategory first, then the wider industry, ordered by shared business format, overlapping investment range, Item 20 outlet count and search interest. This is not a ranking or recommendation.
Lawn Doctor
The Grounds Guys
Conserva Irrigation
Lawns
Augusta Franchise LLC
Spring-Green Lawn Care Corp.Head-to-head comparisons
At a glance
Business history
Not reviewed
Owner participation
Not reviewed
Territory language
Litigation disclosure
Not reviewed
Bankruptcy disclosure
Not reviewed
Agreement term
Not reviewed
Reader notes on wording
Our automated check found that these summaries may not match the FDD's exact wording. Read the FDD excerpt itself; it is the authoritative text. Core cost, fee, Item 19 and outlet figures are not affected.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Vehicle repairs and maintenance
“Vehicle repairs & maintenance expense 5 3,621 $ 0.4%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 50 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Recurring Revenue Percent
“Recurring Revenue Percent 69.0%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 50 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Customer Retention Rate
“Customer Retention Rate 83.8%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total customers serviced
“Total customers serviced 1,006 834 172”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total accounts — All Customers
“Total number of Accounts 1,006 834 172”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average annual accounts per vehicle
“Average annual accounts per service vehicle 287 417 115”
Note: The figure is readable, but a verbatim context quote lacks a numeric whole-location sample count; the required context submission was rejected. I cannot infer a count from vehicle totals or invent quoted text.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average annual square feet per vehicle
“Average annual square feet per service vehicle 4,073,734 2,420,066 6,278,625”
Note: The figure is readable, but a verbatim context quote lacks a numeric whole-location sample count; the required context submission was rejected. I cannot infer a count from vehicle totals or invent quoted text.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total Disclosed Expenses
“Total Disclosed Expenses 312,700 $ 32.5%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 50 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Sales Conversion Rate
“Sales Conversion Rate 32.9%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Professional fees
“Professional fees 12 6,700 $ 0.7%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total service vehicles in service
“Total service vehicles in service 3.5 2.0 1.5”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Revenue — Residential
“Total Revenue per Category $963,529 $603,242 $360,287”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Brand fund contribution
“Brand fund contribution 16 9,635 $ 1.0%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total accounts — Commercial
“Total number of Accounts 1,006 834 172”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average annual revenue per vehicle
“Average annual revenue per service vehicle $275,294 $301,621 $240,191”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Cost of Labor
“Cost of Labor 3 182,960 $ 19.0%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Software licenses
“Software licenses 11 1,860 $ 0.2%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Advertising & Marketing
“Advertising & Marketing 4 75,686 $ 7.9%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average revenue/account — All Customers
“Average Annualized Revenue per account $957.78 $723.31 $2,094.69”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Gross Profit
“Gross Profit 535,076 $ 55.5%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: New customers signing contracts
“number of new customers signing a new service contract (210)”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Technology Fee
“Technology Fee 15 19,271 $ 2.0%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Vehicle lease expenses
“Vehicle lease expenses 6 49,590 $ 5.1%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total square feet serviced
“Total square feet serviced 14,258,070 4,840,132 9,417,938”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total accounts — Residential
“Total number of Accounts 1,006 834 172”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Renewal contracts
“number of customers signing a renewal contract (330) during the reporting period”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Vehicle fuel & tolls expense
“Vehicle fuel & tolls expense 26,418 $ 2.7%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Prior-period contracted customers
“total number of customers that had contracts in the twelve months preceding the reporting period (394)”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total service visits completed
“Total service visits completed 6,219 5,749 470”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Cost of Materials
“Cost of Materials 2 245,493 $ 25.5%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Insurance
“Insurance 8 14,421 $ 1.5%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Uniforms and operating supplies
“Uniforms and operating supplies 13 2,835 $ 0.3%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Mobile phones and Internet
“Mobile phones and Internet 9 4,505 $ 0.5%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 50 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Recurring revenue dollars
“($664,598) divided by the total net revenue earned over the reporting period ($963,529)”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average revenue/account — Residential
“Average Annualized Revenue per account $957.78 $723.31 $2,094.69”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Royalty
“Royalty 14 77,082 $ 8.0%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Prospects receiving a quote
“total number of prospective customers that received a quote for services (638)”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 50 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total net revenue dollars
“($664,598) divided by the total net revenue earned over the reporting period ($963,529)”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Equipment Expenses
“Equipment Expenses 7 7,725 $ 0.8%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Revenue
“Revenue 1 963,529 $ 100.0%”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Revenue — All Customers
“Total Revenue per Category $963,529 $603,242 $360,287”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Revenue — Commercial
“Total Revenue per Category $963,529 $603,242 $360,287”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Total Gross Revenue
“Total Gross Revenue $963,529 $603,242 $360,287”
Note: The cited metric is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit across four territories. Its context save cannot pass validation without that count; I cannot infer or invent it.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Merchant Services
“Merchant Services 10 13,352 $ 1.4%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 48 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average revenue/account — Commercial
“Average Annualized Revenue per account $957.78 $723.31 $2,094.69”
Note: The figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location sample count in a verbatim quote for its singular Reporting Unit across four territories. The required context save failed validation; I cannot invent a quote or use account counts as location counts.
Item 19 · PDF p. 49 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Revenue less Disclosed Expenses
“Revenue less Disclosed Expenses 222,375 $ 23.1%”
Note: The cited figure is readable, but the filing gives no numeric whole-location count in a verbatim quote for the single Reporting Unit described across four territories. Context correction was rejected by validation; I cannot invent a quote or treat territories as locations.
Item 19 · PDF p. 51 · 2025 FDD
Our summary: Average annual visits per vehicle
“Average annual visits per service vehicle 1,777 2,875 313”
Note: The figure is readable, but a verbatim context quote lacks a numeric whole-location sample count; the required context submission was rejected. I cannot infer a count from vehicle totals or invent quoted text.
Item 21 · PDF p. 57 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Audited financial statements and guarantee of performance are attached as Exhibit A
“Attached to this Disclosure Document as Exhibit A are our financial statements and guarantee of performance.”
Note: The cited page excerpt does not contain the supplied quote verbatim; unable to settle from this page citation.
Independent analysis of franchisor-provided data. Not investment advice. Franopolis does not distribute FDDs.