Franchise opportunities compared

    Sweetwater Technologies vs Temporary Wall Systems

    Reviewed figures from each brand's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), side by side. Each figure carries its FDD year and page. This is not a ranking or recommendation, and the two FDDs may cover different years and location groups.

    Before you compare

    • Sweetwater Technologies figures come from its 2025 FDD and Temporary Wall Systems figures from its 2026 FDD, so the years differ.
    • Temporary Wall Systems discloses more than one business format, so the investment range spans formats; the full report breaks them out.
    • Only Sweetwater Technologies has reviewed Item 19 figures here.
    DisclosureSTSweetwater TechnologiesTemporary Wall Systems
    Financial commitment
    Estimated initial investment (Item 7)
    Not available
    No reviewed Item 7 total
    $155,444 – $936,444
    2026 FDD · Item 7
    Standard initial franchise fee (Item 5)
    $2,500
    2025 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 13
    Not available
    No single standard fee identified
    Royalty (Item 6)
    25%
    Royalty Fee — 25% of Gross Sales collected for hourly services
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12
    8%
    open and operating. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you must still pay the Royalty Fee equal to — 8
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 28
    Brand / advertising fund (Item 6)
    3%
    Brand Fund Contributions — up to 3% of Gross Sales — 3%
    2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12
    3% of 2) currently, — 3
    Program or any other training program. ITEM 6 OTHER FEES Brand Fund Contribution
    2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 17
    System scale & health
    Total outlets (Item 20)
    5
    Outlets at end of 2024
    2025 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 44
    Not available
    No reviewed outlet counts
    Net outlet change (Item 20)
    +4
    Calculated: 1 at end of 2022 → 5 at end of 2024
    Not available
    Only one year reported
    Outlet exits (Item 20)
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Not available
    No complete exit records for a year
    Franchising since (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Franchisor founded (Item 1)
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Not available
    Not in reviewed records
    Performance (Item 19)
    Financial performance (Item 19), by location group
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Franchised Business 3
    3,801 acres
    other Chart A Franchised Business 3 · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 42
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Franchised Business 1
    $232,363
    other Chart A Franchised Business 1 · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 42
    Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Franchised Business 2
    $106,850
    other Chart A Franchised Business 2 · 2025 FDD · Item 19 · PDF p. 42
    +2 more groups in the full report
    Not disclosed — no Item 19 financial performance representation

    Item 19 groups are shown separately and never combined. Revenue or sales figures are not profit. Net outlet change and turnover are Franopolis calculations from the disclosed counts; turnover is a count-based rate, not a measure of owner earnings.

    Sweetwater Technologies vs Temporary Wall Systems: common questions

    How do Sweetwater Technologies and Temporary Wall Systems royalties compare?
    Sweetwater Technologies: 25% (2025 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 12); Temporary Wall Systems: 8% (2026 FDD · Item 6 · PDF p. 28). Royalties as disclosed in Item 6; other recurring fees are listed separately.
    Do Sweetwater Technologies and Temporary Wall Systems disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
    Sweetwater Technologies has reviewed Item 19 figures for 5 location groups; Temporary Wall Systems makes no Item 19 financial performance representation. Different location groups are not directly comparable, and revenue is not profit.

    Answers restate the reviewed figures above. Not a ranking or recommendation.

    How Franopolis reviews FDD figures