Franopolis

    My Salon Suite

    Franchise research report · reviewed 2026 disclosure data

    Reviewed sources
    Franchising since
    2012
    Source: franchise.org
    Headquarters
    Carrollton, TX United States
    Source: franchise.org

    My Salon Suite franchise operates as a salon suite rental concept, providing individual studio spaces for beauty professionals to run their own businesses withi

    Save Territory check Compare

    Headline figures

    My Salon Suite quick facts

    Is My Salon Suite a franchise?
    Yes. My Salon Suite offers franchises through a Franchise Disclosure Document. At the end of 2025, it reported 51 outlets in total (2026 FDD, Item 20, PDF p. 90).
    How much does it cost to open a My Salon Suite franchise?
    The My Salon Suite Franchise Disclosure Document reports separate estimated initial investments by format: $994,971–$1,820,417 for new location — total estimated — $994971 (2026 FDD, Item 7, PDF p. 29); $66,490–$312,685 for conversion only (conversion/acquisition conversion — total estimated — $66490) (2026 FDD, Item 7, PDF p. 33). These formats are not combined. Each is the franchisor's disclosed estimate, not a quote. Details
    What is the My Salon Suite initial franchise fee?
    The disclosed initial franchise fee for a standard single unit is $1,500 (2026 FDD, Item 5, PDF p. 18). Other fee options (for example multi-unit or conversion) are listed separately in the report. Details
    What ongoing fees does My Salon Suite charge?
    The disclosed ongoing royalty is 2.75% (2026 FDD, Item 6, PDF p. 20). The brand or advertising fund contribution is $200 (2026 FDD, Item 6, PDF p. 20). Other recurring fees are listed in Item 6. Details
    Does My Salon Suite disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
    Yes. The My Salon Suite FDD includes an Item 19 financial performance representation (2026 FDD, Item 19, PDF p. 82). Figures apply only to the locations and period each one covers. Details
    How many My Salon Suite locations are there?
    The FDD reports 51 outlets at the end of 2025 (2026 FDD, Item 20, PDF p. 90). Existing locations do not indicate territory availability. Details
    Is My Salon Suite a good franchise to buy?
    Franopolis does not rate or recommend franchises. From the reviewed FDD: Item 19 includes financial performance figures; check which locations and period they cover; Item 20 lists outlet openings, closures and transfers; Item 6 includes a brand or advertising fund contribution on top of royalty; Item 20 also lists current and former franchisees you can contact. Review the full FDD with a franchise attorney and accountant before deciding.

    From reviewed FDD figures only. Not a recommendation or projection.

    What the disclosures show

    1. 1The 2026 FDD (Item 7) estimates opening costs separately by format: $994,971 – $1,820,417 (New location — TOTAL ESTIMATED — $994971); $66,490 – $312,685 (Conversion/acquisition conversion — TOTAL ESTIMATED — $66490); several initial fee options apply.
    2. 2Item 19 covers 16 separate groups: other measures and revenue and costs and EBITDA for 264 Franchised locations; other measures for 66 Franchised locations; other measures and revenue and costs and EBITDA for 175 Franchised locations; other measures for 66 Franchised locations; profit and EBITDA and other measures for 44 Franchised locations; profit and other measures and EBITDA for 44 Franchised locations; other measures for 11 Franchised locations; other measures for 299 Franchised locations; other measures for 49 Company/affiliate locations; other measures for 269 Franchised locations; other measures for 42 Company/affiliate locations; other measures for 175 Franchised locations; other measures for 23 Company/affiliate locations; other measures for 156 Franchised locations; other measures for 17 Company/affiliate locations; other measures for Franchised locations. They are not combined.
    3. 3Outlets held steady in 2025, to 51 (United States, as labeled in the FDD, Item 20).

    From reviewed FDD figures only. Not a recommendation or projection.

    Franchises under $100kOther brands whose disclosed Item 7 low end fits this budget.Compare outlet trendsPut Item 20 counts side by side with up to 3 other brands.

    My Salon Suite head-to-head

    Closest peers in the same subcategory, side by side from reviewed FDD figures. Not a ranking or recommendation.

    My Salon SuiteVSSola Salon
    Compare head-to-head
    My Salon SuiteVSPhenix Salon Suites
    Compare head-to-head
    My Salon SuiteVSIMAGE Studios
    Compare head-to-head
    My Salon SuiteVSBex + Co Shared Workspace Salon
    Compare head-to-head

    Costs · Items 5–7

    What does it cost to open?

    Estimated opening costs and the fees payable to the franchisor.

    Startup Investment — Item 7

    Range across 2 single-unit formats

    2026 FDD · Item 7

    Formats disclosed in Item 7 (2)

    Each format has its own total. The total depends on the format you choose.

    • Conversion/acquisition conversion — TOTAL ESTIMATED — $66490PDF p. 33$66,490 – $312,685
    • New location — TOTAL ESTIMATED — $994971PDF p. 29$994,971 – $1,820,417

    Standard single-unit franchise fee

    2026 FDD · Item 5 · PDF p. 18
    Discounted and multi-unit options are separate; see all fees.

    Ongoing Fees — Item 6

    Selected recurring charges; payment bases and conditions remain attached to each fee.

    Royalty months1–6 new and conversion excludes resaleMain ongoing fee

    58 reported fees, each with its payment basis, are listed below; they haven't been sorted into recurring, initial and occasional groups yet.

    Financial Performance — Item 19

    What results are disclosed—and for which locations?

    16 separate populations, shown apart. Revenue is not owner income.

    264 locations

    Revenue, costs, EBITDA and other measures · 264 locations

    Who is counted
    All 264 reporting My Salon Suite franchised businesses, labeled All Centers.
    Excluded
    Not full12months, missingreports, underpurchasecontract; GroupOne says>=3000sqft though observedlow2880; GroupTwo model5000–8000sqft; 37of301 lackedexpense data.
    Method
    Unaudited royalty/occupancy reports and2025financialbenchmark survey. Generaloperatingcash expenses excludesnoncash; rentincludesNNN/CAM; EBITDA excludesdebtservice/interest. Sourcefiguresnotrecomputed.

    These groups are never combined.

    Outlet Changes — Item 20

    How has the outlet count changed?

    United States, as labeled in the FDD · counts as of 2025 of each year.

    2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 90

    Net +3 outlets, 2023–2025

    0482023512024512025+30

    Year-end counts reported in Item 20. The scale starts at zero, so the line looks nearly flat; the labels between the dots show each year's change. Openings and closures for 2025 haven't been pulled from the Item 20 tables yet, so no turnover or churn is shown.

    Questions to investigate

    Prompts based on what this brand's reviewed disclosures do and don't show — not conclusions. Join free as a member to save questions to your research.

    For the franchisor

    • Which line items in the 2026 Item 7 estimate ($66,490 – $1,820,417) vary most by market, and why?

    • Which initial fee option would apply to my situation, and what conditions or discounts affect it?

    • Which locations are included in the Item 19 figures, and which were excluded?

    • Reported units went from 51 to 51 in 2025. How many new units opened, closed or changed hands?

    • Is a territory available in my area, and how is it defined in my agreement?

    For current and former owners

    • How did your actual startup costs and timeline compare with the Item 7 estimate?

    • How many hours a week do you work in the business, and in what role?

    • How do your results compare with the Item 19 figures, and what explains the difference?

    • What support from the franchisor has been most and least useful?

    For your advisors

    • Ask a franchise attorney to review the territory, renewal, transfer and termination terms.

    • Ask an accountant to build a cash-flow plan using your own assumptions, not the franchisor's.

    Sources & vintage history

    Every displayed fact is retained with its disclosure vintage, item, page, and reviewed status. Prior vintages remain on file rather than being overwritten.

    Citations (2026 FDD)

    1. [1]Standard initial franchise fee — Item 5 · PDF p. 18
    2. [2]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — All 264 reporting My Salon Suite franchised businesses, labeled All Centers. · PDF p. 82
    3. [3]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) · PDF p. 82
    4. [4]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group Two model all · PDF p. 86
    5. [5]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) · PDF p. 83
    6. [6]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group Two model top profitability quartile · PDF p. 86
    7. [7]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Group Two model bottom profitability quartile · PDF p. 87
    8. [8]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupOne maturity0–6 months · PDF p. 84
    9. [9]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupOne maturity12+ months · PDF p. 84
    10. [10]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupOne maturity12+ months · PDF p. 84
    11. [11]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupOne maturity24+ months · PDF p. 84
    12. [12]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupOne maturity24+ months · PDF p. 84
    13. [13]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupTwo model maturity12+ months · PDF p. 88
    14. [14]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupTwo model maturity12+ months · PDF p. 88
    15. [15]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupTwo model maturity24+ months · PDF p. 88
    16. [16]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — GroupTwo model maturity24+ months · PDF p. 88
    17. [17]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record · PDF p. 85; PDF p. 80
    18. [18]Outlet counts — Item 20, Table 1 · PDF p. 90

    "PDF p." is the page in the PDF file; "printed p." is the number printed on the FDD page. Source document: FDD

    Territory & operations

    These are contract disclosures, not confirmation that any territory is currently available.

    Legal & agreement

    Franchisor financial statements

    Fiscal yearMeasureReported value
    2025assets current assets cash and cash equivalents$7,317,851
    2025accounts receivable - net$6,784,879
    2025current portion of notes receivable - net$210,629
    2025amounts due from affiliates$326,305
    2025prepaid expensesMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing$4,506,910
    2025other current assets$293,729
    2025total current assets$19,440,303
    2025fixed assets - net$20,524,625
    2025right of use assets - net$63,631,973
    2025notes receivable, less current portion - net$546,223
    2025other assetsMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing$2,834,382
    2025current liabilities accounts payable$440,250

    These figures describe the franchisor company, not individual franchise locations.

    SBA-backed loans to franchisees

    Loading…

    Source: U.S. Small Business Administration 7(a) & 504 FOIA data. Loan volume is not a measure of franchisee success.

    Related research

    Brands in the same subcategory first, then the wider industry, ordered by shared business format, overlapping investment range, Item 20 outlet count and search interest. This is not a ranking or recommendation.

    Sola SalonPhenix Salon SuitesIMAGE StudiosBex + Co Shared Workspace SalonBeauty BungalowsGreat Clips, Inc.

    Head-to-head comparisons

    My Salon Suite vs Sola SalonMy Salon Suite vs Phenix Salon SuitesMy Salon Suite vs IMAGE StudiosMy Salon Suite vs Bex + Co Shared Workspace SalonMy Salon Suite vs Beauty BungalowsMy Salon Suite vs Great Clips, Inc.
    Compare reviewed facts

    At a glance

    Business history

    Not reviewed

    Owner participation

    Not reviewed

    Territory language

    Litigation disclosure

    Not reviewed

    Bankruptcy disclosure

    Not reviewed

    Agreement term

    Not reviewed

    Reader notes on wording

    Our automated check found that these summaries may not match the FDD's exact wording. Read the FDD excerpt itself; it is the authoritative text. Core cost, fee, Item 19 and outlet figures are not affected.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Occupancy — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Occupancy 100% 61.3 % 95. 1 % 91. 2 % 38 57.6 %”

      Note: Table 2 title says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this count represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Gross Revenue — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Gross Revenue $1, 325,611 $ 218,355 $ 526,984 $ 546,468 100.0% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Gross Revenue — Share of revenue

      “Gross Revenue $1, 325,611 $ 218,355 $ 526,984 $ 546,468 100.0% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Gross Revenue — Median

      “Gross Revenue $1, 325,611 $ 218,355 $ 526,984 $ 546,468 100.0% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 General Operating Expense — High

      “General Operating Expense $193,380 $13,192 $78,989 $83,368 15.3% 30 45.5%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 General Operating Expense — Share of revenue

      “General Operating Expense $193,380 $13,192 $78,989 $83,368 15.3% 30 45.5%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 General Operating Expense — Median

      “General Operating Expense $193,380 $13,192 $78,989 $83,368 15.3% 30 45.5%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Rent Expense — Median

      “Rent Expense $395,169 $65,739 $128,826 $135,847 24.9% 27 40.9%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Rent Expense — Mean

      “Rent Expense $395,169 $65,739 $128,826 $135,847 24.9% 27 40.9%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Rent Expense — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Rent Expense $395,169 $65,739 $128,826 $135,847 24.9% 27 40.9%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Royalties — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Royalties $72,909 $12,010 $28,984 $30,056 5.5% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Royalties — Mean

      “Royalties $72,909 $12,010 $28,984 $30,056 5.5% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Royalties — Share of revenue

      “Royalties $72,909 $12,010 $28,984 $30,056 5.5% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 EBITDA* — Share of revenue

      “EBITDA* $ 664,154 $ 110,121 $ 286,435 $ 297,198 54 .4% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 EBITDA* — Mean

      “EBITDA* $ 664,154 $ 110,121 $ 286,435 $ 297,198 54 .4% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 EBITDA* — Low

      “EBITDA* $ 664,154 $ 110,121 $ 286,435 $ 297,198 54 .4% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Occupancy — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Occupancy 100% 29.0 % 81.1 % 79.1 % 37 56.1 %”

      Note: Table 3 states lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this occupancy figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Occupancy — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “Occupancy 100% 29.0 % 81.1 % 79.1 % 37 56.1 %”

      Note: Table 3 states lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this occupancy figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Occupancy — Mean

      “Occupancy 100% 29.0 % 81.1 % 79.1 % 37 56.1 %”

      Note: Table 3 states lowest 25% based on profitability, but the Table 3 header in the FDD source says Bottom Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Gross Revenue — High

      “Gross Revenue $ 669,993 $ 113,811 $ 351,873 $ 355,924 100.0% 32 48.5 %”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Gross Revenue — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Gross Revenue $ 669,993 $ 113,811 $ 351,873 $ 355,924 100.0% 32 48.5 %”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — Low

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — High

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — Mean

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Rent Expense — High

      “Rent Expense $540,901 $97,203 $163,616 $179,050 50.3% 25 37.9%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Royalties — Low

      “Royalties $36,850 $6,260 $19,353 $19,576 5.5% 32 48.5%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Rent Expense — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “Rent Expense $540,901 $97,203 $163,616 $179,050 50.3% 25 37.9%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Rent Expense — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “Rent Expense $540,901 $97,203 $163,616 $179,050 50.3% 25 37.9%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Royalties — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “Royalties $36,850 $6,260 $19,353 $19,576 5.5% 32 48.5%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 EBITDA* — High

      “EBITDA* $192, 958 ( $ 145,600) $ 73,219 $ 61,399 17.3 % 39 59.1%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this EBITDA figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 EBITDA* — Share of revenue

      “EBITDA* $192, 958 ( $ 145,600) $ 73,219 $ 61,399 17.3 % 39 59.1%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this EBITDA figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 EBITDA* — High

      “EBITDA* $ 664,154 $ 110,121 $ 286,435 $ 297,198 54 .4% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 EBITDA* — Median

      “EBITDA* $ 664,154 $ 110,121 $ 286,435 $ 297,198 54 .4% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Royalties — High

      “Royalties $72,909 $12,010 $28,984 $30,056 5.5% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Gross Revenue — Low

      “Gross Revenue $1, 325,611 $ 218,355 $ 526,984 $ 546,468 100.0% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Occupancy — High

      “Occupancy 100% 29.0 % 81.1 % 79.1 % 37 56.1 %”

      Note: Table 3 states lowest 25% based on profitability, but the Table 3 header in the FDD source says Bottom Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Rent Expense — Share of revenue

      “Rent Expense $395,169 $65,739 $128,826 $135,847 24.9% 27 40.9%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Rent Expense — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “Rent Expense $395,169 $65,739 $128,826 $135,847 24.9% 27 40.9%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 General Operating Expense — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “General Operating Expense $193,380 $13,192 $78,989 $83,368 15.3% 30 45.5%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Royalties — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “Royalties $72,909 $12,010 $28,984 $30,056 5.5% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — Median

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Gross Revenue — Median

      “Gross Revenue $ 669,993 $ 113,811 $ 351,873 $ 355,924 100.0% 32 48.5 %”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Gross Revenue — Share of revenue

      “Gross Revenue $ 669,993 $ 113,811 $ 351,873 $ 355,924 100.0% 32 48.5 %”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — Share of revenue

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 EBITDA* — Number meeting or exceeding mean

      “EBITDA* $192, 958 ( $ 145,600) $ 73,219 $ 61,399 17.3 % 39 59.1%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this EBITDA figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 General Operating Expense — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “General Operating Expense $201,622 $10,701 $91,442 $95,900 26.9% 28 42.4%”

      Note: Table 3 title says the lowest 25% based on profitability, but its header says Bottom Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 Rent Expense — Low

      “Rent Expense $395,169 $65,739 $128,826 $135,847 24.9% 27 40.9%”

      Note: Table 2 narrative says the top 25% by profitability; its column header says Top Quartile by Revenue (66 locations). The FDD does not settle which population this financial figure represents.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 82 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One top quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table2 EBITDA* — Share meeting or exceeding mean

      “EBITDA* $ 664,154 $ 110,121 $ 286,435 $ 297,198 54 .4% 31 47.0%”

      Note: Table 2 states top 25% based on profitability, but the Table 2 header in the FDD source says Top Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    • Item 19 · PDF p. 83 · 2026 FDD

      Our summary: Group One bottom quartile (narrative profitability; header revenue) Table3 Occupancy — Low

      “Occupancy 100% 29.0 % 81.1 % 79.1 % 37 56.1 %”

      Note: Table 3 states lowest 25% based on profitability, but the Table 3 header in the FDD source says Bottom Quartile by Revenue. The group definition is internally inconsistent, so this group-specific figure cannot be settled.

    Independent analysis of franchisor-provided data. Not investment advice. Franopolis does not distribute FDDs.

    Compare My Salon Suite with…

    VS