DoodyCalls
Franchise research report · reviewed 2026 disclosure data
Researching DoodyCalls franchise opportunities? Every figure below is cited to the FDD.
- Franchising since
- 2016 Source: franchise.org
- Headquarters
- Columbia, MD United States Source: franchise.org
DoodyCalls franchise specializes in pet waste removal services, helping busy pet owners maintain clean yards through regular scheduled cleanings and one-time se
Headline figures
DoodyCalls quick facts
- Is DoodyCalls a franchise?
- Yes. DoodyCalls offers franchises through a Franchise Disclosure Document. At the end of 2025, it reported 134 franchised and 0 company-owned outlets (2026 FDD, Item 20, PDF p. 71).
- How much does it cost to open a DoodyCalls franchise?
- The DoodyCalls Franchise Disclosure Document reports an estimated initial investment of $76,450–$93,850 (2026 FDD, Item 7, PDF p. 30). This is the franchisor's disclosed estimate, not a quote. Details
- What ongoing fees does DoodyCalls charge?
- The disclosed ongoing royalty is 7.5% (2026 FDD, Item 6, PDF p. 17). The brand or advertising fund contribution is 1.5% (2026 FDD, Item 6, PDF p. 17). Other recurring fees are listed in Item 6. Details
- Does DoodyCalls disclose financial performance (Item 19)?
- Yes. The DoodyCalls FDD includes an Item 19 financial performance representation (2026 FDD, Item 19, PDF p. 67). Figures apply only to the locations and period each one covers. Details
- How many DoodyCalls locations are there?
- The FDD reports 134 outlets at the end of 2025 (2026 FDD, Item 20, PDF p. 71). Existing locations do not indicate territory availability. Details
- Is DoodyCalls a good franchise to buy?
- Franopolis does not rate or recommend franchises. From the reviewed FDD: Item 19 includes financial performance figures; check which locations and period they cover; Item 20 lists outlet openings, closures and transfers; Item 6 includes a brand or advertising fund contribution on top of royalty; Item 20 also lists current and former franchisees you can contact. Review the full FDD with a franchise attorney and accountant before deciding.
From reviewed FDD figures only. Not a recommendation or projection.
What the disclosures show
- 1Opening costs are estimated at $76,450 – $93,850 in the 2026 FDD (Item 7); several initial fee options apply.
- 2Item 19 covers 20 separate groups: other measures and revenue for Franchised locations; other measures for 17 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 16 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 18 Franchised territories; other measures for 16 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 16 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 16 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 16 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 65 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 51 Franchised franchisees; other measures for 39 Franchised territories; other measures for 26 Franchised territories; other measures for 22 Franchised territories; other measures for 20 Franchised territories; other measures for 107 Franchised territories; revenue for Franchised locations; revenue for 88 Franchised territories; other measures for 25 Franchised territories; other measures for 18 Franchised territories; other measures for 87 Franchised territories. They are not combined.
- 3Outlets grew by 23 in 2025, to 134 (United States, as labeled in the FDD, Item 20).
From reviewed FDD figures only. Not a recommendation or projection.
DoodyCalls head-to-head
Closest peers in the same subcategory, side by side from reviewed FDD figures. Not a ranking or recommendation.
Costs · Items 5–7
What does it cost to open?
Estimated opening costs and the fees payable to the franchisor.
Startup Investment — Item 7
Total estimated initial investment
2026 FDD · Item 7 · PDF p. 30
Ongoing Fees — Item 6
Selected recurring charges; payment bases and conditions remain attached to each fee.
- Royalty Fee — greater of 7.5% of Gross Revenue or the Minimum Royalty FeeMain ongoing fee
86 reported fees, each with its payment basis, are listed below; they haven't been sorted into recurring, initial and occasional groups yet.
Financial Performance — Item 19
What results are disclosed—and for which locations?
20 separate populations, shown apart. Revenue is not owner income.
Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — All franchisees whose Franchised Businesses were operational for any part of th…
Revenue and other measures
- Who is counted
- All franchisees whose Franchised Businesses were operational for any part of the year
- Period
- 2021
- Excluded
- Two Company-Owned Outlets operated by our affiliate until January 2024 are excluded from the tables.
- Method
- Franchisee reports, gross revenue includes all products/services/income whether collected and open territory; excludes bona fide refunds; no commissions deducted.
These groups are never combined.
Outlet Changes — Item 20
How has the outlet count changed?
United States, as labeled in the FDD · counts as of 2025 of each year.
2026 FDD · Item 20 · PDF p. 71
Net +46 outlets, 2023–2025
Year-end counts reported in Item 20. The scale starts at zero; the labels between the dots show each year's change. Openings and closures for 2025 haven't been pulled from the Item 20 tables yet, so no turnover or churn is shown.
Questions to investigate
Prompts based on what this brand's reviewed disclosures do and don't show — not conclusions. Join free as a member to save questions to your research.
For the franchisor
Which line items in the 2026 Item 7 estimate ($76,450 – $93,850) vary most by market, and why?
Which initial fee option would apply to my situation, and what conditions or discounts affect it?
Which locations are included in the Item 19 figures, and which were excluded?
Reported units went from 111 to 134 in 2025. How many new units opened, closed or changed hands?
Is a territory available in my area, and how is it defined in my agreement?
For current and former owners
How did your actual startup costs and timeline compare with the Item 7 estimate?
How many hours a week do you work in the business, and in what role?
How do your results compare with the Item 19 figures, and what explains the difference?
What support from the franchisor has been most and least useful?
For your advisors
Ask a franchise attorney to review the territory, renewal, transfer and termination terms.
Ask an accountant to build a cash-flow plan using your own assumptions, not the franchisor's.
Sources & vintage history
Every displayed fact is retained with its disclosure vintage, item, page, and reviewed status. Prior vintages remain on file rather than being overwritten.
Citations (2026 FDD)
- [1]Estimated initial investment — Item 7 · PDF p. 30
- [2]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — All franchisees whose Franchised Businesses were operational for any part of th… · PDF p. 67
- [3]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Top 25% franchisee group: 17 franchisees representing 46 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [4]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 2nd Quartile group: 16 franchisees representing 25 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [5]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 3rd Quartile group: 16 franchisees representing 18 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [6]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 3rd Quartile group: 16 franchisees representing 18 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [7]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 3rd Quartile in Table 3: 16 franchisees representing 18 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [8]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Bottom 25% in Table 3: 16 franchisees representing 18 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [9]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 3 Bottom 25% group: 16 franchisees representing 18 Territories. · PDF p. 69
- [10]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 3 TOTALS: 65 franchisees representing 107 Territories. · PDF p. 69
- [11]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 3 TOTALS above-average figures; note (4) references 51 franchisees, while… · PDF p. 69
- [12]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 4 Top 25% territory group: 17 franchisees representing 39 Territories. · PDF p. 69
- [13]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 4 2nd Quartile territory group: 16 franchisees representing 26 Territorie… · PDF p. 69
- [14]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 4 3rd Quartile territory group: 16 franchisees representing 22 Territorie… · PDF p. 69
- [15]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 4 Bottom 25% territory group: 16 franchisees representing 20 Territories. · PDF p. 69
- [16]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 4 TOTALS territory group: 65 franchisees representing 107 Territories. · PDF p. 69
- [17]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — All franchisees whose Franchised Businesses were operational for any part of 20… · PDF p. 67
- [18]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 88 Territories in business and reporting revenue as of December 31, 2024 and De… · PDF p. 68
- [19]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — 2nd Quartile group: 16 franchisees representing 25 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [20]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Bottom 25% in Table 3: 16 franchisees representing 18 Territories · PDF p. 69
- [21]Item 19 — Locations counted not stated in the reviewed record — Table 4 TOTALS; note (4) references 87 Territories for the above-average count… · PDF p. 69
- [22]Outlet counts — Item 20, Table 1 · PDF p. 71
"PDF p." is the page in the PDF file; "printed p." is the number printed on the FDD page. Source document: FDD
Territory & operations
97 addresses in Franopolis's imported location list. Coverage may differ from Item 20 outlet counts.
These are contract disclosures, not confirmation that any territory is currently available.
Legal & agreement
Franchisor financial statements
| Fiscal year | Measure | Reported value |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | assets current assets cash and cash equivalentsMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $94 |
| 2025 | accounts receivable, netMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $27,163 |
| 2025 | inventoryMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $2,872 |
| 2025 | total current assetsMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $36,112 |
| 2025 | property and equipment, netMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $2,723 |
| 2025 | goodwill, netMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $210,029 |
| 2025 | total assetsMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $594,816 |
| 2025 | accrued and other liabilitiesMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $15,136 |
| 2025 | deferred revenueMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $9,316 |
| 2025 | member's equity | $535,934 |
| 2025 | total liabilities and member's equity | $594,816 |
| 2025 | franchise service feesMore than one value recorded for this year — open the FDD source before comparing | $178,580 |
These figures describe the franchisor company, not individual franchise locations.
SBA-backed loans to franchisees
Loading…
Source: U.S. Small Business Administration 7(a) & 504 FOIA data. Loan volume is not a measure of franchisee success.
Related research
Brands in the same subcategory first, then the wider industry, ordered by shared business format, overlapping investment range, Item 20 outlet count and search interest. This is not a ranking or recommendation.
Head-to-head comparisons
At a glance
Business history
Not reviewed
Owner participation
Not reviewed
Territory language
Litigation disclosure
Not reviewed
Bankruptcy disclosure
Not reviewed
Agreement term
Not reviewed
Reader notes on wording
Our automated check found that these summaries may not match the FDD's exact wording. Read the FDD excerpt itself; it is the authoritative text. Core cost, fee, Item 19 and outlet figures are not affected.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2023 — Reacquired
“2023 1 2 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20 Table 3; verification is limited to national/systemwide Total rows.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2023 — Ceased other
“2023 1 2 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20 Table 3; verification is limited to national/systemwide Total rows.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2024 — Nonrenewals
“2024 0 1 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Alabama row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so this claim is unsupported within scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2024 — Reacquired
“2024 0 1 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Alabama row in Item 20. The review rule permits only national/systemwide Total rows.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2024 — Ceased other
“2024 0 1 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is not a national/systemwide Total row in Item 20, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2024 — End
“2024 0 1 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is not a national/systemwide Total row in Item 20, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2025 — Opened
“2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Item 20 row, not a national/systemwide Total row, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2025 — Reacquired
“2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Item 20 row, not a national/systemwide Total row, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2025 — End
“2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Alabama row in Item 20, not a national/systemwide Total row, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2023 — Terminated
“2023 1 2 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20, not a national/systemwide Total row, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2023 — Opened
“2023 1 2 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20, not a national/systemwide Total row, so it is outside the permitted review scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 72 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 2 Texas 2025 — Transfers
“2025 1”
Note: This is an Item 20 state-level transfer row. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so the state figure is outside scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2024 — Terminated
“2024 0 1 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Item 20 row. The required check is limited to national/systemwide Total rows, so this state entry cannot be verified under that scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 72 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 2 North Carolina 2025 — Transfers
“2025 2”
Note: This is an Item 20 state-level transfer row. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so the state figure is outside scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 72 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 2 Illinois 2024 — Transfers
“2024 2”
Note: This is an Item 20 state-level transfer row. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so the state figure is outside scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 72 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 2 Maryland 2023 — Transfers
“2023 1”
Note: This is an Item 20 state-level transfer row. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so the state figure is outside scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 72 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 2 Maryland 2024 — Transfers
“2024 1”
Note: This is an Item 20 state-level transfer row. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so the state figure is outside scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Alabama 2024 — Start
“2024 0 1 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Item 20 row. The required check is limited to national/systemwide Total rows, so this state entry cannot be verified under that scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2025 — End
“2025 3 1 0 0 0 0 4”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2024 — Terminated
“2024 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2025 — Nonrenewals
“2025 3 1 0 0 0 0 4”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2024 — Nonrenewals
“2024 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2023 — Start
“2023 2 1 0 0 0 1 2”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2024 — End
“2024 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2025 — Ceased other
“2025 3 1 0 0 0 0 4”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Arizona 2024 — Reacquired
“2024 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Arizona row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2024 — Nonrenewals
“2024 2 4 0 0 0 0 6”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2025 — Opened
“2025 6 1 0 0 0 0 7”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2023 — Start
“2023 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2023 — Opened
“2023 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2024 — Start
“2024 2 4 0 0 0 0 6”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2023 — Ceased other
“2023 2 1 0 0 0 1 2”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2025 — End
“2025 6 1 0 0 0 0 7”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 California 2024 — Opened
“2024 2 4 0 0 0 0 6”
Note: This is a state-level California row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2024 — Ceased other
“2024 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2025 — Nonrenewals
“2025 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2025 — Opened
“2025 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2025 — End
“2025 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2024 — Terminated
“2024 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2025 — Ceased other
“2025 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2025 — Terminated
“2025 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Colorado 2023 — End
“2023 3 0 0 0 0 0 3”
Note: This is a state-level Colorado row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2025 — Reacquired
“2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2025 — Start
“2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2023 — Opened
“2023 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2023 — Reacquired
“2023 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2024 — Start
“2024 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2025 — Nonrenewals
“2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2023 — Nonrenewals
“2023 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Item 20 · PDF p. 73 · 2026 FDD
Our summary: Table 3 Connecticut 2024 — Nonrenewals
“2024 1 0 0 0 0 0 1”
Note: This is a state-level Connecticut row in Item 20. The review rule allows only national/systemwide Total rows, so it is outside the permitted scope.
Independent analysis of franchisor-provided data. Not investment advice. Franopolis does not distribute FDDs.
Compare DoodyCalls with…
VSCompare DoodyCalls with…
VS